BRIDGING DIVIDES: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR RESOLVING THE KASHMIR DISPUTE IN INTEGRATED PARADIGM OF CONSTRUCTIVISM AND LIBERALISM

Abstract

Background: Since their independence in 1947, Pakistan and India have remained in perpetual conflict over the Kashmir region, leading to multiple wars and continuous diplomatic tensions. Both nations claim full sovereignty over Kashmir, reinforcing competing national narratives that deepen hostilities. The dispute has resulted in over 75 years of regional instability, three major wars, and persistent ceasefire violations. Given the nuclear capabilities of both countries, conventional power-based solutions have proven ineffective, necessitating a paradigm shift toward sustainable conflict resolution mechanisms.

Objective: This study aims to develop a comprehensive resolution model for the Kashmir dispute by integrating Constructivist and Liberal theoretical frameworks. The study explores discourse maintenance, economic interdependence, and diplomatic engagement as viable mechanisms for conflict transformation.

Methods: A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing thematic, content, and critical discourse analysis of primary and secondary data. Secondary data were gathered from academic publications, policy reports, and international organization records. Primary data included expert interviews with scholars specializing in South Asian geopolitics and conflict resolution. Comparative historical analysis of past treaties and agreements was conducted to assess the effectiveness of previous diplomatic efforts.

Results: Findings revealed that over 5,600 ceasefire violations occurred between 2000 and 2020 along the Line of Control, exacerbating hostilities. Economic trade volume between India and Pakistan peaked at $2.5 billion in 2018 but declined by 48% post-2019, highlighting the direct impact of political decisions on economic interdependence. Nationalist rhetoric in leadership statements increased by 62% from 2015 to 2023, reinforcing entrenched political positions. Historical case studies showed that 68% of proposed Confidence-Building Measures (CBMs) were not implemented due to lack of political will.

Conclusion: The study concludes that a structured approach integrating discourse transformation, economic interdependence, and institutional reforms is necessary for resolving the Kashmir dispute. Sustainable peace requires a departure from power-centric strategies toward diplomatic and economic cooperation, modeled on successful international precedents.